Sunday, March 25, 2007

Week of MARCH 26, 2007

1, NO REGULAR CLASSES THIS WEEK BUT STUDENTS WILL MEET INDIVIDUALLY FOR CONFERENCES.
Patterson Hall, Room 429, at scheduled time.
Please bring all work to the meeting (unless I have it already)

HOMEWORK: DUE April 3, 2007

1, READING Ch.10 pages, (170 - 204) In EAA, Ch.4 in TSIS
ALSO --for Documenting Sources (CITATION) there are good examples in EAC, pg 424- 442

2, Post your weekly blog entry and comment.

3, Comment on NY times article below. Answer the questions - a, What is the author's claim? Do you agreewith this claim? Use quotes to support your comment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25gilbert.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

March 25, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
Compassionate Commercialism

By DANIEL GILBERT
Cambridge, Mass.

IN an advertising campaign that began last week, Nissan left 20,000 sets of keys in bars, stadiums, concert halls and other public venues. Each key ring has a tag that says: “If found, please do not return. My next generation Nissan Altima has Intelligent Key with push-button ignition, and I no longer need these.”
This campaign is clever, but not particularly original.
It was 1997, and the man who was crouched on the sidewalk at 68th and Broadway in New York City was one of the most pathetic souls I’d ever seen. His limbs were twisted in what appeared to be arthritic agony and tears were streaming down his face. “Please,” he whimpered. “Please, somebody help me.”
Most passers-by did what they were named for, but my wife and I stopped. The man looked up. “Please,” he sobbed. “I just want to go home.” My hand needed no guidance from my brain as it reached into my wallet and extracted $10. “Thank you,” he said as I handed him the money. “Thank you so much.” My wife and I mumbled some embarrassed words and walked on.
We hadn’t gone a block when she tugged my sleeve. “Maybe we should have gotten him into a cab,” she said. “He could barely stand up. He might need help. We should go back to see.” My wife is the patron saint of lost kittens and there is no arguing, so we went back to see. And what we saw was our horribly crippled friend walking briskly and happily up 68th Street, opening the door to a late-model car, getting in and driving away after what was apparently a short day of theatrical work.
I know two things now that I didn’t know then.
First, I now know that my hand did what human hands were designed to do. Research suggests that we are hard-wired with a strong and intuitive moral impulse — an urge to help others that is every bit as basic as the selfish urges that get all the press. Infants as young as 18 months will spontaneously comfort those who appear distressed and help those who are having difficulty retrieving or balancing objects. Chimpanzees will do the same, though not so reliably, which has led scientists to speculate about the precise point in our evolutionary history at which we became the “hypercooperative” species that out-nices the rest.
The second thing I know now that I didn’t know then is that this was the most damaging crime I had ever experienced. Like most residents of large cities, I’d been a victim before — of burglary once, of vandalism several times. But this was different. The burglars and vandals had taken advantage of my forgetfulness (“Why didn’t I double lock the door?”) and taught me to be better.
But the actor on 68th Street had taken advantage of my helpfulness and taught me to be worse. The hand that had automatically reached for my wallet had been slapped, and once slapped was twice shy. I’ve never again given money to a stranger without scrutinizing him for the signs that distinguish suffering from its imitation. And because I don’t know what those signs are, I typically just walk by.
Now corporate America has taken a lesson from the guild of shameless grifters. Nissan’s plan to leave those 20,000 sets of keys in public venues is every bit as crafty as the fraudulent performance that a decade ago left me with holes in both my pocketbook and soul. There is no selfish reason to bend down and pick up a key ring, but Nissan knows that we will bend without thinking because the impulse to help is bred into our marrow. Our best instinct will be awakened by a key ring and then punished by a commercial. Like rubes throughout the ages, we will be lured by a false cry of distress and quickly cured of our innocence and compassion.
We are used to commercial tricks that play on our fears. The official-looking letter marked “Verification Audit” is actually a magazine subscription renewal form; the credit card company’s ominous call to “discuss your account” is actually an attempt to sell new services.
Should we now get used to commercial tricks that play on our humanity? How would we feel about a device planted in trash bins that screams “I’m stuck!” until the lid is opened, at which point it continues, “Stuck in a dead end job, that is — and if you are too, then let us show you how to make millions in real estate with no money down”? Is it O.K. to send a thousand doleful puppies into the streets with tags that say: “Thanks for checking. And speaking of checking, our bank charges no monthly fees”?
What happens to us when greed masquerades as need, when cries for help become casting calls for chumps, when our most noble actions make us patsies? “You put an idea out there and seed it,” said the president of the advertising agency that came up with Nissan’s key ring ploy. “And people carry it for you.” Indeed they do. The idea being seeded and carried in this case is that the world cries wolf, that our moral impulse betrays us and that smart people should keep on walking.
Daniel Gilbert, a professor of psychology at Harvard, is the author of “Stumbling on Happiness.”

">
<$BlogItemTitle$>

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

HOMEWORK: Due March 22, 2007

1, Please bring a draft of your Research Paper: Part II to class
as we'll be doing peer editing.
2, Weekly entry on your blog

">
<$BlogItemTitle$>

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

HOMEWORK: Due March 20, 2007

HOMEWORK
1, Final Draft: Rhetorical Analysis
2, Research Paper, Part II (Draft only for peer review)
3,Comment on 2 classmate's blogs (if you haven't yet done so)
Note: (DO NOT COME TO CLASS UNLESS YOU HAVE THE WORK COMPLETED)

4, Read and comment on the NY Times article below (on my blog!)
http://nytimes.com/marketing/winatrip/?mkt=tsmmphoto

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/opinion/11kristof.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fNicholas%20D%20Kristof

March 11, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Win a Trip, and See a Different World
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Cast your eyes above and meet Hidaya Abatemam, whom I met last month in a remote area of southern Ethiopia. She is 6 years old and weighs 17 pounds.
Hidaya was starved nearly to death and may well have suffered permanent mental impairment, helping to trap her — and her own children, if she lives that long — in another generation of poverty.
Yet maybe the more interesting question is not why Hidaya is starving but why the world continues to allow 30,000 children like her to die each day of poverty.
Ultimately what is killing girls like her isn’t precisely malnutrition or malaria, but indifference. And that, in turn, arises from our insularity, our inexperience in traveling and living in poor countries, so that we have difficulty empathizing with people like Hidaya.
I often hear comments from readers like: “It’s tragic over there, but we’ve got our own problems that we have to solve first.” Nobody who has held the hand of a starving African child could be that dismissive.
That lack of firsthand experience abroad also helps explain why we are so awful at foreign policy: we just don’t “get” how our actions will be perceived abroad, so time and again — in Vietnam, China, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan and Latin America — we end up clumsily empowering our enemies.
Part of the problem is that American universities do an execrable job preparing students for global citizenship. A majority of the world’s population lives on less than $2 a day, but the vast majority of American students graduate without ever gaining any insight into how that global majority lives.
According to a Roper/National Geographic poll, 38 percent of Americans aged 18 to 24 consider speaking another language to be “not too important.” Sixty-three percent of those young Americans can’t find Iraq on a map of the Middle East. And 89 percent don’t correspond regularly with anyone outside the U.S.
A survey cited by the Modern Language Association found that only 9 percent of American college students enroll in a foreign language class.
Let’s face it: We’re provincial.
That’s one reason that I always exhort college students to take a “gap year” and roam the world, or at least to take a summer or semester abroad — and spend it not in Paris or London, but traveling through Chinese or African villages. Universities should give course credit for such experiences — and offer extra credit for students who catch intestinal worms.
So I’m now putting my company’s money where my mouth is. On Tuesday, in partnership with MySpace.com, The New York Times and I will announce a second annual “win a trip” contest to choose a university student to travel with me on a reporting trip to Africa. And this year, in addition to a student, I’ll choose a schoolteacher — from a middle school or high school — to accompany me as well. We'll probably travel together to Rwanda, Burundi and Congo.
Last year I chose a young woman from Mississippi, Casey Parks, and we traveled together through central Africa. Casey and I saw malnourished children just like Hidaya, and visited burned-out villages in areas of the Central African Republic that had been caught up in the furies of the spreading Darfur genocide. Pygmy trackers led us through the jungle to see gorillas and elephants, and we managed to be held up at gunpoint by bandits.
In Cameroon, we interviewed a doctor about maternal mortality — and then found a woman named Prudence, a mother of three, dying in the next room. A dead fetus was decomposing inside her, setting off a raging infection, but the doctor didn’t care about her. And so she died. You can know intellectually that half a million women die in pregnancy each year, but it’s still shattering to see a woman die so unnecessarily in front of you.
If you win the trip, you won’t be practicing tourism, but journalism. You’ll blog and prepare videos for the New York Times and MySpace Web sites. I’m betting that you’ll be able to connect with young readers and viewers — and galvanize them to care about these issues — in a way that I can’t.
So please spread the word about the contest. Rules and applications will be posted Tuesday at www.nytimes.com/winatrip and at www.myspace.com/kristofontheground.
And for those who apply but don’t win, go anyway on your own. You’ll learn more than you ever would from an equivalent period in the classroom. And you’ll gain not only the occasional intestinal parasite but also an understanding of why we should fight to save children like Hidaya.

Monday, March 12, 2007

HOMEWORK: Due March 13, 2007

1, Rhetorical analysis paper
2, Comment on 2 class mates' blogs
3, Review ch.2, They Say, I Say

">
<$BlogItemTitle$>

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

HOMEWORK: Due March 1, 2007

1, Post an article to your blog and comment on it

2, Read the following articles found in Everything's an Argument
pg 519 (read again and write a commentary), pg 486 "Turning Boys Into Girls",
pg 540 "We Should Relinquish Some Liberty in Exchange for Security,"
pg 627 "Bad As They Want to Be"

3, Read Chapter 3 in They Say, I Say



Monday, February 26, 2007

Skateboarding in the Olympics?

Skateboarding in the Olympics?
From Steve Cave,Your Guide to Skateboarding.FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now!
Aug 4 2005
The discussion seems to have shifted from "should" to "when"
The discussion about skateboarding in the Olympics has been going on for quite some time, with a lot of energy behind it. Lately however, the discussion has changed from "Should skateboarding be in the Olympics?" to "When will skateboarding enter the Olympics?".
Many skaters are concerned that if skateboarding becomes an Olympic sport, the heart of skating will be changed. Skateboarding is an individualistic and independent activity, and many feel that if it is forced into the mold of the Olympics, it will lose its edge and change into something mainstream.
The International Association of Skateboard Companies (IASC) held an open meeting at ASR in the fall of 2004, and I was fortunate enough to be there.
zSB(3,3)
Sponsored Links
They discussed many things, but the most heated topic was skateboarding becoming an Olympic sport. Gary Ream, president of the USA Skateboarding Association led the discussion. "We're Damned if we do, damned if we don't," said Ream. He explained that if the world of skateboarding doesn't pull together and enter the Olympics on purpose, someone else will eventually succeed in entering it, and then we will have no influence over what it will look like. "It's going to happen with or without us," Ream explained.
The difficulty is that skateboarding is fiercely independent. Therefore, there is no one single governing body for the sport. In fact, Ream even discussed that they aren't entirely sure they want to call skateboarding a sport. Perhaps instead it should be an exhibition.
Without one leading organization, many small groups have tried over the years to claim the title of Skateboarding's Ruling Body. USA Roller Sports (USARS) was one of the loudest, but plenty of these groups didn't even have anything to do with skateboarding! Roller blade organizations, television networks - Clarkie from Real Skate even says she knows of a soccer organization that tried to lay the claim.
On July 19th, 2004 a meeting of skaters from all of the planet was held in Dortmund, Germany to talk about forming an "International Skateboarding Federation". After much debate, the ISF was voted on and formed. The ISF is now taking the position and talking with the International Olympic Commitee (IOC) about skating becoming an Olympic sport, and what it will look like in China in 2008. Will it happen by then? No one knows for sure, but interestingly China is in the process of building the world's largest skate park. However, before skateboarding can be added, Gary Ream explained that a sport would have to be removed from the Olympics to make room. Apparently there is a limit on the number of medals that can be awarded, and the Olympics is currently at that limit.
As you can see, there is a lot of work that needs to be done between now and then if skateboarding will enter the 2008 Olympics. But, the discussion is no longer should skateboarding enter the Olympics, but when, and what will it look like.

I believe skateboarding is eventually going to be in the olympics. It will most likely only be vert skating which i think is a good idea. At first I thought skateboarding in the olympics was like selling out, what have the olympics ever done for skateboarding? I now realize that they will be helping each other out, the olympics will give vert skating the respect and coverage it needs to stay alive while skateboarding will help pull in a younger generation of viewers like snowboarding has done for the winter olympics. I now support the idea of skateboarding in the summer olympics, but if they want to get street skating too I will highly against it.
">
<$BlogItemTitle$>

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

FOR TUESDAY FEBRUARY 27, 2007

There will be no class on Thurs. Feb 22!!
Use this time to work on your research for your final paper.

Homework due Feb 27
1, Create blog. Then post one argumentative article of your choosing (the topic can be your research topic or another that interests you) from a reputable source and write a comment about it, stating the argument, both sides and your opinion on it.
2, Write a one page summary, outling your research topic. Explain both sides of the argument and state your opinion. If it's helpful you can use the template I distributed in class called Template for Academic Argument . It is also found in your text They Say, I Say
3, Readings: Read Chapter 14 (285-98); Rhetorical Analysis, Chapter Eighteen, “What Counts as Evidence.” (367-82). Make notes on what you've read and be ready to talk about it.